Ladle 44
Moderator: Light
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 9:47 pm
Re: Ladle 44
i pm u back psy and i dnt like the idea sry
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 9:47 pm
Re: Ladle 44
hey if this is a problem can i just switch oreo and walle and no phantom
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 9:47 pm
Re: Ladle 44
so just switch players take 1 out and put 1
Re: Ladle 44
Hey Won't make it beyond the first round! LOL! will take on Speeders if no1 else has the balls to.
Re: Ladle 44
It's not a problem, all your changes are OK. We just wanted to point out the rules page since you guys might not be familiar with it, being kind of new to this tournament and all. We're glad to have you!Convict.LoT. wrote:hey if this is a problem can i just switch oreo and walle and no phantom
Re: Ladle 44
Psy, I would go ahead and take this offer.LucK wrote:Hey Won't make it beyond the first round! LOL! will take on Speeders if no1 else has the balls to.
Let's talk briefly about the late-comer rule. It was created back when we only had enough teams to barely fill a 16-slot bracket. We're talking 1-3 byes at most to go through if any at all. But we've had a couple consecutive 32-team brackets, which leaves a late-comer over a dozen byes to go through. This is unreasonable in my opinion.
In cases such as this, should we add something that says:
"... you may ask the team with the first bye for permission to fill the open slot. If they refuse, go through the byes in order... or you may take the first bye offered voluntarily."
Or maybe it should say "highest bye offered voluntarily before 12:00 GMT Ladle day."
Anyone see a problem with this? Should we write it in?
In the future, we may have a tournament website that prevents you from signing up with less than 4 players, or maybe sends a reminder email out if you do.
- matchbox53
- Round Winner
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:18 pm
Re: Ladle 44
gl all and hf may the best team win!!!! \o/
Re: Ladle 44
DS'ers have no problem playing against Speeders see you tommorrow guys and gL
-
- Match Winner
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:36 am
Re: Ladle 44
+1 (heh)Convict.LoT. wrote:thanks since.wav
Yeah sine, that's great. It's a bit ridiculous to go around lobbying to every team with a bye, and so the offers should be out in the open, and the team with the lowest bye that accepts should face the latecomer.
Re: Ladle 44
I added Speeders to bye-4 against Dark Syndicate. Glad to see you could make it psy & company.
Right now they are in ID Chicago, which is the appropriate place to play according to "server flow." I know most of them are EU players; do we have a problem with them using an EU server? There are plenty of them free...
Right now they are in ID Chicago, which is the appropriate place to play according to "server flow." I know most of them are EU players; do we have a problem with them using an EU server? There are plenty of them free...
-
- Match Winner
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:36 am
Re: Ladle 44
we have us players who can get some experience and play time in ID chicago we honestly dont mind either way and its ds' bye they can use whatever server they want
Re: Ladle 44
One more thing my auth isnt working for the ladle servers, and we need a team leader just in case if milan shows up late cause 3B cant make this ladle
Re: Ladle 44
No need to worry. I've checked the authority and you're on the list. The servers just haven't been updated yet (as you can see by some of their names, Ladle 43, 41...). We'll make sure you get OP'd at least if there is a problem.Spook wrote:One more thing my auth isnt working for the ladle servers, and we need a team leader just in case if milan shows up late cause 3B cant make this ladle