Ladle 42
Moderator: Light
Re: Ladle 42
/me cant wait
Re: Ladle 42
So seeded teams are 1. uNk 2. Rogue 3. pru (4. SP?) if YIDG refuses seed?
The Halley's comet of Armagetron.
ps I'm not tokoyami
ps I'm not tokoyami
- kyle
- Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
- Posts: 1876
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 3:33 pm
- Location: Indiana, USA, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy, Universe, Multiverse
- Contact:
Re: Ladle 42
No, only 3 teems gets seeded if one forfeits their seed
Re: Ladle 42
I like thisowned wrote:Everyone is bumped up a spot (assuming yidg doesn't reclaim their seed), and the 4th seed is chosen randomly.
Re: Ladle 42
looking at the rules now, YIDG won't be back this ladle. so there will only be 3 seeds.
Re: Ladle 42
The seeds are 1.uNk 2. R 3. Pru 4. either randomly chosen or nonexistent, it doesn't make any difference.
Edit: My 666th Post! I feel the need to add this on:
Edit: My 666th Post! I feel the need to add this on:
Last edited by owned on Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Ladle 42
Guys, unk does not get the seed. Team.uNk gets the seed, not uNk.team .
Re: Ladle 42
damn it liz... way to inform me....
- Phytotron
- Formerly Oscilloscope
- Posts: 5041
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 10:06 pm
- Location: A site or situation, especially considered in regard to its surroundings.
- Contact:
Re: Ladle 42
No Hitchhiker's references? I'm so disappointed.
Re: Ladle 42
No Team Vogon signed up yet?
Re: Ladle 42
perhaps we could make this a little more sub-friendly. After each match, teams have a round to sub in and shuffle. Then they /admin start_new_match. thoughts?
Re: Ladle 42
+1Concord wrote:perhaps we could make this a little more sub-friendly. After each match, teams have a round to sub in and shuffle. Then they /admin start_new_match. thoughts?
Re: Ladle 42
I thought the new tournament code allows for shuffling before players join? Has this been committed? Shouldn't we be using it? Z-Man?
Re: Ladle 42
It's in both 0.2.8 and trunk bzr branches by now and always active. I don't know whether it's wise to enforce running bzr code on all servers. I do it myself, of course, but only because I pretend to know when it's broken. I could extract this specific feature as a patch for 0.2.8.3.1 if there is demand (it's just revision 1240 in 0.2.8 ).sinewav wrote:Has this been committed? Shouldn't we be using it? Z-Man?