Ladle 41

A place for threads related to tournaments and the like, and things related too.

Moderator: Light

Post Reply
User avatar
Mkay1
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 1146
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 4:35 pm
Contact:

Ladle 41

Post by Mkay1 »


Magic
Core Dumper
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:33 pm

Re: Ladle 41

Post by Magic »

-1 for tardyness

Hoax
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 892
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 5:24 pm
Location: UK

Re: Ladle 41

Post by Hoax »

Magic there implementing his own crude version of meccas forum karma

dariv
Round Winner
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:24 pm

Re: Ladle 41

Post by dariv »

Did this overwrite the ladle 40 wiki? Why don't we create a new page for a new ladle?
pLxDari - Challenge us!

User avatar
dreadlord
Match Winner
Posts: 585
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:26 am
Location: Germany

Re: Ladle 41

Post by dreadlord »

1. Creating a new page for every new ladle would be much more work.

2. You can find the brackets of all past ladles on the challenge board.

User avatar
Jip
Round Winner
Posts: 397
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:32 pm

Re: Ladle 41

Post by Jip »

dariv wrote:Did this overwrite the ladle 40 wiki? Why don't we create a new page for a new ladle?
http://wiki.armagetronad.net/index.php?title=Ladle_40

User avatar
INW
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1949
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:10 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA

Re: Ladle 41

Post by INW »

dariv wrote:Did this overwrite the ladle 40 wiki? Why don't we create a new page for a new ladle?
A new page is made for each ladle after the ladle is over so that the url to the challenge board is the same url every ladle.
Creating a new page for each ladle before the actual ladle will mean that each ladle will have a different url to get to sign up teams.

Me and luck have implemented this for the WST starting this WST.

Magic
Core Dumper
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:33 pm

Re: Ladle 41

Post by Magic »

Hoax wrote:Magic there implementing his own crude version of meccas forum karma
Mine doesn't have positives ;)

PokeMaster
Match Winner
Posts: 639
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:36 am

Re: Ladle 41

Post by PokeMaster »

glad it took 3 people to answer dariv's question. wd.
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Concord
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 5:24 pm

Re: Ladle 41

Post by Concord »

I like that Pike takes the time to alphabetize the team list. It's a nice touch.

PokeMaster
Match Winner
Posts: 639
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:36 am

Re: Ladle 41

Post by PokeMaster »

ohhhhh that is nice. wd pike!
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

User avatar
Mkay1
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 1146
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 4:35 pm
Contact:

Re: Ladle 41

Post by Mkay1 »

TAOF is just looking for trouble. I assume they are planning to op their members, as so many smurf trams do. In this case, nobody really knows who is playing. As a result, one player could be playing for two teams. For all we know, they are not a valid team, considering those names could just be random.

We really need an @ladle auth, to prevent things like this.

Then again, are they breaking the rules?

Edit: nvm this post, I guess..although an @ ladle auth would be cool
Last edited by Mkay1 on Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:39 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
sinewav
Graphic Artist
Posts: 6205
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:37 am
Contact:

Re: Ladle 41

Post by sinewav »

I wouldn't worry about it.

PokeMaster
Match Winner
Posts: 639
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:36 am

Re: Ladle 41

Post by PokeMaster »

innocent until proven guilty. You don't know what they're about, so don't make assumptions.
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

User avatar
Mkay1
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 1146
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 4:35 pm
Contact:

Re: Ladle 41

Post by Mkay1 »

K, assumptions make an ass out of I.

Post Reply