Ladle 38
Moderator: Light
Re: Ladle 38
inb4 SP rage
- Desolate
- Shutout Match Winner
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:31 pm
- Location: Probably golfing
Re: Ladle 38
LOL! I told Tx we should rename to this(based on Nelhybel):
.x] Cold, .x] Rude, .x] Troll, .x] Flame, .x] Bait, .x] Whine, .x] Complain, .x] Curse, .x] LOL!, .x] Drama, .x] Spam, .x] Hater
- INW
- Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:10 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC, USA
Re: Ladle 38
Why don't you go back to changing the ladle team name from TX to the old one: Twi¦×¦ted ¦×¦atsDesolate wrote:LOL! I told Tx we should rename to this(based on Nelhybel):
.x] Cold, .x] Rude, .x] Troll, .x] Flame, .x] Bait, .x] Whine, .x] Complain, .x] Curse, .x] LOL!, .x] Drama, .x] Spam, .x] Hater
I think it looks way better! And you guys also used these for two teams:
Twi¦×¦ted ¦×¦ats ¹
Twi¦×¦ted ¦×¦ats ²
Re: Ladle 38
déjà vugawdzilla wrote:inb4 SP rage
Re: Ladle 38
Overreaction, much.
On a lighter note, I guess people won't rage this time because they see uNa as a lesser skilled team, which is a bit hypocritical.. what will be said about the alias' ordeal this time?
On a lighter note, I guess people won't rage this time because they see uNa as a lesser skilled team, which is a bit hypocritical.. what will be said about the alias' ordeal this time?
Re: Ladle 38
I'm going to go ahead and stick up for Gawdzilla by saying I didn't think that was a particularly provocative statement considering SP's vocal stance on aliases.
Re: Ladle 38
I just want to remind the bracket people that there are seeds in this ladle.
1.CT
2.SP
3.UNK
4.R
1.CT
2.SP
3.UNK
4.R
Re: Ladle 38
You forgot HoaxDesolate wrote:LOL! I told Tx we should rename to this(based on Nelhybel):
.x] Cold, .x] Rude, .x] Troll, .x] Flame, .x] Bait, .x] Whine, .x] Complain, .x] Curse, .x] LOL!, .x] Drama, .x] Spam, .x] Hater
Re: Ladle 38
He's there.ppotter wrote:You forgot HoaxDesolate wrote:LOL! I told Tx we should rename to this(based on Nelhybel):
.x] Cold, .x] Rude, .x] Troll, .x] Flame, .x] Bait, .x] Whine, .x] Complain, .x] Curse, .x] LOL!, .x] Drama, .x] Spam, .x] Hater
- Desolate
- Shutout Match Winner
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:31 pm
- Location: Probably golfing
Re: Ladle 38
I edited the teams "Drug Addict" and "The other guys" to the proper format. Don't ban me
Re: Ladle 38
Just wondering: wasn't there a 10 player limit added?# Twi¦×¦ted ¦×¦ats (13 players listed)
wondering because we (R) have 2 more subs to add.
didn't find it on the wiki
Re: Ladle 38
What? You are going to get some kind of response if you post, insulting a clan.gawdzilla wrote:Overreaction, much.
No one is being hypocritical... as you and sine.wav have already exemplified, the community knows SP's stance on aliases and posting here will result in nothing constructive.gawdzilla wrote:On a lighter note, I guess people won't rage this time because they see uNa as a lesser skilled team, which is a bit hypocritical.. what will be said about the alias' ordeal this time?
I think we have made our position clear...Also regarding the original post, what valuable was said? It's just a little jab at SP, some bait. Feeling strongly about an issue isn't synonymous with rage.sinewav wrote:I'm going to go ahead and stick up for Gawdzilla by saying I didn't think that was a particularly provocative statement considering SP's vocal stance on aliases.
Re: Ladle 38
silly meEckz wrote: He's there.
- Desolate
- Shutout Match Winner
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:31 pm
- Location: Probably golfing
Re: Ladle 38
I thought the limit was 13. I looked at the guidelines too, but didn't see anything about player limits, pretty sure sine removed it. What purpose does it really serve anyway? uNk has posted over 10 as well.