LADLE 36

A place for threads related to tournaments and the like, and things related too.

Moderator: Light

Locked
User avatar
sinewav
Graphic Artist
Posts: 6319
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:37 am
Contact:

Re: LADLE 36

Post by sinewav »

orion wrote:i was the leader of the team, then i say sorry if you need it. but you have to understand we won this beating all and lossing only 1 match 100-94.
That was the worst, most insincere apology I've ever hear. You just made things worse. If you really believed it was "just a game," then you wouldn't have switched teams after the brackets were finalized.

Also, you're not a leader. You're Flex's dog. There. I said it. Sorry if it hurts your feelings, but you must understand it's just a game, right?

User avatar
orion
Match Winner
Posts: 782
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: LADLE 36

Post by orion »

a game dont make me nothing np.. if u understand bad what i said well np.. if u think im the dog of flex, i think he is my leader, leader of sp generally but np... :)
Image

User avatar
orion
Match Winner
Posts: 782
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: LADLE 36

Post by orion »

Cody <3 wrote:
orion wrote:i was the leader of the team, then i say sorry if you need it. but you have to understand we won this beating all and lossing only 1 match 100-94.
i only hope you matture and understand its only a game. the only good post i saw is the Olive`s post...
who understand that its just a game, not neccesary fight. we will try to not ofend nothing next ladle :D
now pls stop it
By the way its looking, You,Flex and some other SP are BANNED next ladle.
uh, then open team will win this :(
some questions:
am i the first on edit wiki wrong?
flex is multicaptain? where i never saw him as captain.
flex have to be banned for add 2 teams? hmmm is the only one who did it?
you cody banned me automatically? hmm then i ban you XD
see you
Image

User avatar
-*inS*-
Round Winner
Posts: 320
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 10:31 pm

Re: LADLE 36

Post by -*inS*- »

Sine.wav: personal attacks aren't required here, please refrain from such immaturity. If you believe this will set a precedent, then by all means make a rule. I look at ladle 35 and the alias controversy, it appears you made a vote and now we have authed ladles, I don't see anyone punished for that?

Crimson King: Whoever you are, I have no respect for an account created yesterday that has more than half it's posts pertaining to sp. You are just someone afraid to post with your real name and try to attack me in game during the ladle.

Cody: I'm not sure I follow you? Firstly you have no case for banning me, and secondly banning flex/Orion won't solve anything. In fact it will make this situation worse.

Finally, I am disapointed with the way people have responded to this. Instead of constructive fix XYZ, I hear let's ban XYZ. Why? Will that fix what has happened? Is that what you want to satisfy you sense of "justice". Fact is, this won't change the past, only perhaps decrease compatition for the next ladle.
Image

gawdzilla
Liz of the many names
Posts: 1124
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:13 am

Re: LADLE 36

Post by gawdzilla »

orion wrote:i was the leader of the team, then i say sorry if you need it. but you have to understand we won this beating all and lossing only 1 match 100-94.
i only hope you matture and understand its only a game. the only good post i saw is the Olive`s post...
who understand that its just a game, not neccesary fight. we will try to not ofend nothing next ladle :D
now pls stop it
Image

ins, calm down. It's just a game! Who cares if we break the rules and then insult eachother?

It's just a game DERP.

User avatar
orion
Match Winner
Posts: 782
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: LADLE 36

Post by orion »

i think we all know what we did wrong what no... and i know personaly i dont have to edit again wiki bcs you will blame me forever. i really need not play a ladle for that? is it a big problem?
or i have other idea, the organizers: sinewav, freekill, kyle, durka, zmans and idk who more.. can create page where you are the only able to edit it, like pbworks.
if i edited wiki was bcs i tought this team had no players, i dont think im bad by that, if im bad the i delete it everytime :S
Image

gawdzilla
Liz of the many names
Posts: 1124
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:13 am

Re: LADLE 36

Post by gawdzilla »

What does it matter what you think? I thought the entire open team wasn't gonna show up, should I delete them next time I 'think' something?

Edit: I really wish I was able to sleep at night so I could stop posting here out of boredom. :D

User avatar
orion
Match Winner
Posts: 782
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: LADLE 36

Post by orion »

this will be my last post in this topic.
i only tried to say: if for only an error i have to be banned, so everyone have to..
Image

User avatar
prettylights
On Lightcycle Grid
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 9:14 pm

Re: LADLE 36

Post by prettylights »

pointing out that you were switching to play a harder team is irrelevant. the point is that switching to play a harder team also makes it permissible to switch and play an easier team. for example, no one points out the advantage Orion's team gained from the switch. no one expected them to win, but that should also be noted since advantages were given.

sp tries so hard. as if just having two teams isnt enough of an advantage in da ladle
\\eNVY

User avatar
-*inS*-
Round Winner
Posts: 320
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 10:31 pm

Re: LADLE 36

Post by -*inS*- »

prettylights wrote: for example, no one points out the advantage Orion's team gained from the switch. no one expected them to win
excellent point :)

people are complaining due to SPD winning, I realize IB complained before, but the pitchforks can be very contagious among the others ;).
Image

User avatar
Eckz
Core Dumper
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 3:27 am

Re: LADLE 36

Post by Eckz »

-*inS*- wrote:people are complaining due to SPD winning
Nobody is complaining about you winning, nobody even "really" cares. It is that you can't grasp the fact that what was done was wrong.
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage

User avatar
prettylights
On Lightcycle Grid
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 9:14 pm

Re: LADLE 36

Post by prettylights »

my post was not a complaint about your win, but actually the opposite. win or loss and independent of the team(s) concerned or buffoon involved (flex), disciplinary actions should be taken the same (if the ladle has them yet).
\\eNVY

PsYkO
Core Dumper
Posts: 180
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 6:39 pm

Re: LADLE 36

Post by PsYkO »

I think his main point was the contagious pitchforks, jussayin.

User avatar
-*inS*-
Round Winner
Posts: 320
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 10:31 pm

Re: LADLE 36

Post by -*inS*- »

Eckz wrote:
-*inS*- wrote:people are complaining due to SPD winning
Nobody is complaining about you winning, nobody even "really" cares. It is that you can't grasp the fact that what was done was wrong.
I am confused, I don't recall ever recall discussing the morality of the issue???

And agreed psyko ^^
Image

User avatar
Eckz
Core Dumper
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 3:27 am

Re: LADLE 36

Post by Eckz »

I know YOU don't remember, because you're ignoring it.
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage

Locked