Yes it was amazing. It was fun for all (I think), even us losers! I can find very little that went wrong with Ladle 23. We had a great turn out. The matches started and ended on time for the most part too. They are still running a bit late though...
I believe Ladle 24 is a voting Ladle. In the next few days we should post a "Ladle 24 voting discussion" thread so we can talk about a few things. Some of the past rules haven't been a problem and maybe we don't have to include them in this round of voting (like the rule about challenge board names and aliases seems to be a non-issue lately - maybe just change the ladle guidelines to reflect this?)
Some new rules could stand a vote though. I'd like to get a good discussion going about LIMIT_TIME for Ladles, and possibly making the finals "best of 3" instead of "best to 3". Although it worked in TX's favor tonight, I'm not sure that it is really necessary to have more matches in the finals than the semis. If it's to prove who is
truly best, I want Plus+ to have 2 more matches against CT because our quarters were a toss-up!
