Who is actually active?

What do you want to see in Armagetron soon? Any new feature ideas? Let's ponder these ground breaking ideas...
Luke-Jr
Dr Z Level
Posts: 2246
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 4:03 pm
Location: IM: [email protected]

Who is actually active?

Post by Luke-Jr »

Can we get a list of actual active contributors? I don't mean just listed as "active" status, but actually having time to do things... I'm also including non-developers who contribute in other ways than code. If you're not listed on this (updated) post -- or you're listed with a "?" or wrong status --, please reply with which category you belong under :)

(for reference, I plan to follow this up with a request to guru3/z-man/Lucifer to grant at least one person on the Actually Active list access to the various resources we have available, especially webhosting)

Actually Active:
* dlh (dev) ?
* epsy (dev)
* Kyle (dev)
* Lackadastical (web)
* luke-jr (dev)
* Pathetique ?
* Seeker (test + doc)

"Active":
* guru3 (dev + web?)
* Jonathan (dev)
* Lucifer (dev)
* sine.wav (content)
* voodoo ?
* wrtlprnft (dev)
* yaart ?
* z-man (dev)

Formally Retired:
* everyone else ?
Last edited by Luke-Jr on Thu Jul 15, 2010 4:50 pm, edited 6 times in total.

User avatar
sinewav
Graphic Artist
Posts: 6214
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:37 am
Contact:

Re: Who is actually active?

Post by sinewav »

Actually Active.

User avatar
Lackadaisical
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 822
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2003 4:58 pm
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Who is actually active?

Post by Lackadaisical »

Actually active (although not last/this week)

epsy
Adjust Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 2006
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 6:02 pm
Location: paris
Contact:

Re: Who is actually active?

Post by epsy »

I am active, though into side-projects. I'll concentrate on windows support soon enough on the cmake branch. However, I need someone else to work on the OSX part.

gawdzilla
Liz of the many names
Posts: 1124
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:13 am

Re: Who is actually active?

Post by gawdzilla »

Are you guys gonna/working on armagetron 0.4?

Luke-Jr
Dr Z Level
Posts: 2246
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 4:03 pm
Location: IM: [email protected]

Re: Who is actually active?

Post by Luke-Jr »

Lizmatic wrote:Are you guys gonna/working on armagetron 0.4?
This belongs on the 0.4 thread... :p

User avatar
Your_mom
Match Winner
Posts: 653
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 1:45 am

Re: Who is actually active?

Post by Your_mom »

"lurking"

User avatar
Jonathan
A Brave Victim
Posts: 3392
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Not really lurking anymore

Re: Who is actually active?

Post by Jonathan »

For completeness, I'd put myself under the "active"/lurking label.
ˌɑrməˈɡɛˌtrɑn

Stealer
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 7:19 pm

Re: Who is actually active?

Post by Stealer »

I'm hoping to be.

Luke-Jr
Dr Z Level
Posts: 2246
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 4:03 pm
Location: IM: [email protected]

Re: Who is actually active?

Post by Luke-Jr »

Stealer wrote:I'm hoping to be.
You registered just to post this... who are you? ;)

Might I suggest popping in on IRC? We hang out in #Armagetron on Freenode.

Pathetique
Average Program
Posts: 71
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 1:05 am

Re: Who is actually active?

Post by Pathetique »

Ohai Luke.

I hurd u liek mudkipz.

I would place myself in the gametype/server development category.

And can I have my resource account reactivated?

Luke-Jr
Dr Z Level
Posts: 2246
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 4:03 pm
Location: IM: [email protected]

Re: Who is actually active?

Post by Luke-Jr »

Pathetique wrote:I would place myself in the gametype/server development category.
Are you actually active or just "active"? I only recall seeing a single small branch by you a while back (currently on my 0.4 proposed merge list...) :p
Pathetique wrote:And can I have my resource account reactivated?
Resource accounts have never been deactivated. Also, OFF TOPIC HERE. Open a new thread for this nonsense next time.

Pathetique
Average Program
Posts: 71
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 1:05 am

Re: Who is actually active?

Post by Pathetique »

Luke-Jr wrote:
Pathetique wrote:I would place myself in the gametype/server development category.
Are you actually active or just "active"? I only recall seeing a single small branch by you a while back (currently on my 0.4 proposed merge list...) :p
That's the only enhancement I've had to make so far to let my ideas take form for a server. Other than that, I do contribute development ideas that are beyond my programming abilities.

User avatar
compguygene
Adjust Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 2333
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:09 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Contact:

Re: Who is actually active?

Post by compguygene »

Pathetique wrote:
Luke-Jr wrote:
Pathetique wrote:I would place myself in the gametype/server development category.
Are you actually active or just "active"? I only recall seeing a single small branch by you a while back (currently on my 0.4 proposed merge list...) :p
That's the only enhancement I've had to make so far to let my ideas take form for a server. Other than that, I do contribute development ideas that are beyond my programming abilities.
I think that Luke is trying to identify those that are actually active writing code at this time, or plan to be. Luke seems to have been trying to get people on board with getting the coding going that needs done for a .4 stable client/server to be released.
Armagetron: It's a video game that people should just play and enjoy :)
https://bit.ly/2KBGYjvCheck out the simple site about TheServerPharm

Luke-Jr
Dr Z Level
Posts: 2246
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 4:03 pm
Location: IM: [email protected]

Re: Who is actually active?

Post by Luke-Jr »

Pathetique wrote:Other than that, I do contribute development ideas that are beyond my programming abilities.
Actively, or just occasionally ("active")?

Post Reply