I know this was last page but... "he is not on trial" makes me further realize that this is also none of our business.Z-Man wrote:We've had quite enough of that already, thank you. Besides, he is not on trial.ConVicT wrote:when Durf's not able to defend himself
He could've said "This Guy".
What I'm saying is that he mentioned Durf as if Durf is this community's responsibility, so, therefore, it shouldn't be allowed to happen unless he's allowed to defend himself.
Of course, he would need an appeal for that. My point is; when he's unbanned (If ever), I imagine he'll be on a "trial" period, so why should he have to look at this and not be able to say anything incase he's banned for defending himself?
I would look at this (if I were Durf returning) and think "wtf, I can't even be renewed after a ban even when I planned on saying jack except for tron ideas..."
Then he has to feel like he's been clamped, or he would have to respond to something he was originally banned for?
That sucks the big one, no matter who you are, and he's expressed his problems, so, sucks even more.
We know he can't let things go, he has to have closure.
I just think it's unfair!