December 21, 2012

[Eckz]

It's called sarcasm. Too bad that even had to be pointed out..

lolx

[Ratchet]

I never said it wasn't sarcasm, I was just curious as to why he'd include that source; typically he seems to stick to the facts O.O

[Mkay1]

How are we supposed to know it's sarcasm? I have heard people say things like that before (not irl, but the somebody dud a shoe about it. Either mythbusters or Penn and teller). And some of his views are very unconventional.

[Ratchet]

I agree with you Mkay; it wasn't too terribly clear whether or not it was sarcasm. He has some far-fetched opinions at times ..

[Phytotron]

[sinewav]

[Ratchet]

YOU FOOLS! You have both just violated RULE 3... TO THE DUNGEONS MR ZMAN!

[INW]

YOU FOOL! Rule #9 cancels rule #3!!

[Ratchet]

Well WTFzorz. This system is rigged! By pointing out a rule violation, you also violate a rule!! Agggghhhhh!

[Z-Man]

Overeager reference to rule #9 also violates rule #9! Oh noes! The universe is going to collapse!

[Clutch]

[syllabear]

Boxed, I'm sure that violates something

Zman, that is also rule 9

Ratchet and INW.... you too.

So if my thread is not solely about any one of this rulebreaks, does that mean it has enough variable content to avoid any rules? Since my main point (which it should be judged on) is



Oh no Syllabear only posted an irrelevent picture, ban!

[Lord Pein]

Either way, the interesting thing will be what people do before December 21st.

[Slov]

start saving money now, buy food later and lock themselves in underground basements?

[INW]

Weather the world ends or not, the interesting thing will be what people do before December 21st.

Uhh, you mean "whether?"

<3