Search found 229 matches

by Flex
Tue Mar 09, 2010 6:22 pm
Forum: General
Topic: 4v4 Ladle
Replies: 11
Views: 1448

Re: 4v4 Ladle

We've already had a 4vs4 Fortress tournament. It was quite fun, but it was different to the Ladle. I don't like the idea of Ladles being 4vs4 and I don't think it should ever reach below 5vs5. If you wanted a 4vs4 Fortress tournament then I think it should be in it's own dedicated wiki page and not ...
by Flex
Mon Mar 08, 2010 2:10 am
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Ladle 31
Replies: 60
Views: 7395

Re: Ladle 31

Good games all. We set out to win 3 in a row and we achieved it. Well done guys! The finals were too close!

Screenshots are here or here, (if you're not registered on the SP forums).
by Flex
Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:22 pm
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Ladle 31
Replies: 60
Views: 7395

Re: Ladle 31

Speeders 2 is looking for and has one spot available to fill for this Ladle. Preferably a wing attacker or a centre player. If anybody is interested, PM me and I'll get back to you ASAP or before Saturday.
by Flex
Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:33 pm
Forum: Team Strategy
Topic: Concord's "non-grinding"
Replies: 12
Views: 3661

Re: Concord's "non-grinding"

Well.. I responded to that article and either someone deleted it or made it invisible. I clearly made my point that there's a time and place to allow a non-grinder to not grind and in a public game where people are trying to have fun and actually "win", rather than allowing a non-grinder as Word poi...
by Flex
Sun Feb 14, 2010 5:58 pm
Forum: Competitions
Topic: WST - Brackets up @ 15th!
Replies: 42
Views: 4872

Re: WST - Brackets up @ 15th!

Why the **** would you clear the brackets? If they were indeed done randomly, you would only just randomly fill in the extra teams into the ~bye~ slots and all would be good. There's no need to clear it just because of 1 extra team or server. That makes the whole point of doing it once retarded. Onc...
by Flex
Thu Feb 11, 2010 2:31 am
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Post-Ladle 30 Tactics Discussion
Replies: 45
Views: 5160

Re: Post-Ladle 30 Tactics Discussion

I wasn't going to respond to this thread, because it's so full of flame-bait, but I just feel I want to address some issues here. Recently there's a few people going around talking crap about us to anybody that's willing to listen. It's also increased after this Ladle, because they don't like it tha...
by Flex
Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:54 pm
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Money Tournament
Replies: 63
Views: 7161

Re: Money Tournament

I had/have a very similar idea with a tournament management system, that I had plans for a while back. I wanted to introduce the Sumo Knock-out and Team Sumo Knock-out tournaments under the kings of the grid brand, and then eventually expand that into official and unofficial tournaments and leagues,...
by Flex
Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:27 am
Forum: General
Topic: Ladle 30 Finals on Youtube.
Replies: 6
Views: 1214

Re: Ladle 30 Finals on Youtube.

Nice and thanks!

It's not as good as your last ones, though. :P They were pretty good. And also, my music is so much better than yours! :(
by Flex
Mon Feb 08, 2010 5:53 pm
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Ladle 30
Replies: 79
Views: 9100

Re: Ladle 30

Huh? She was indeed on our roster and playing for Speeders. We told her to wear the tag for that exact reason of making sure she's counted as a team member. Nothing sneaky going on. ;) Thanks Vogue for subbing for us, in-case FoFo didn't turn up or ended up lagging, as he was playing in a cafe and c...
by Flex
Mon Feb 08, 2010 4:17 pm
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Ladle 30
Replies: 79
Views: 9100

Re: Ladle 30

GG's, GM's. We were swiftly moving a head, and Plus seemed history, until the second match and that failtorp really brought them back into the game, something like 90-60 ending up 100-98 to them. After that SP really felt the brunt of their determination to win. A combination of their teamwork, play...
by Flex
Mon Feb 08, 2010 3:54 pm
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Ladle 30 31 and 32 Rules and timing discussion
Replies: 63
Views: 8564

Re: Ladle 30 31 and 32 Rules and timing discussion

There was an issue in Ladle 30 where a team leader was changed at the last moment, which then they were left without authority on all servers. More details in this thread. But basically, it obviously wasn't the Ladles fault or the server admins, but I think maybe we can make things a little easier o...
by Flex
Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:33 am
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Ladle 30 31 and 32 Rules and timing discussion
Replies: 63
Views: 8564

Re: Ladle 30 31 and 32 Rules and timing discussion

While we're at that, can we also include the compete Fortress settings (apart from the Ladle changes, of course)? So admins loading from none default settings (or such), simply to prevent errors or avoid inconstancies on servers. I noticed this happen a few times. Due to server admins previously hos...
by Flex
Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:49 am
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Ladle 30 Voting Thread: CLOSED
Replies: 17
Views: 3057

Re: Ladle 30 Voting Thread: OPEN until 2/4 @ 18GMT

On behalf of Speeders:

1. Yes
2. Yes
3. Thursday
4. Yes
by Flex
Mon Feb 01, 2010 4:00 pm
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Ladle 30 31 and 32 Rules and timing discussion
Replies: 63
Views: 8564

Re: Ladle 30 31 and 32 Rules and timing discussion

I agree with there being only a need for 4 GM's or so. If we look at a 16 team bracket and assume half of that the Team Leaders know what they're doing and the other half either don't know or the server isn't set up properly from the previous TM/GM's authority list. But because GM's have the same au...
by Flex
Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:43 am
Forum: General
Topic: Pickup Channel @ IRC
Replies: 37
Views: 4845

Re: Pickup Channel @ IRC

"as a consequence"? How exactly did banning someone from my servers have anything to do with ME being banned from that channel? But I'll go with your reasoning. The server belonged to me, I decide who should play on my servers, if you felt that was unjustified, you could have removed the server from...