Search found 229 matches
- Sun May 13, 2012 8:23 am
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: Ladle 57
- Replies: 220
- Views: 24400
Re: Ladle 57
Consideration added. So are you against aliases or for aliases? Or is your argument; you only did it a little and not as 'bad' as baylife and you don't consider it the same? Does that some how make it better? You signed up your team with your global ID and the rest of the team roster was binary numb...
- Sun May 13, 2012 7:18 am
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: PM Vote Trial for Ladle 57
- Replies: 87
- Views: 9144
Re: PM Vote Trial for Ladle 57
Considering I've got myself involved here, at least I'll provide my input to this.. Weed is in the line of fire for editing another team and causing confusion. The rule is there to prevent confusion and make someone accountable. Insanity is in the line of fire for adding vov, even though he was alre...
- Sun May 13, 2012 4:24 am
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: PM Vote Trial for Ladle 57
- Replies: 87
- Views: 9144
Re: PM Vote Trial for Ladle 57
So the others that also "violated" the rules go unpunished, in your logic?
- Sun May 13, 2012 4:17 am
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: PM Vote Trial for Ladle 57
- Replies: 87
- Views: 9144
Re: PM Vote Trial for Ladle 57
Oh lookie here... http://wiki.armagetronad.org/index.php?title=Ladle/Challenge_Board&oldid=38766 Team "Team Baylife" signed up before Team uNk... So who fault is it that signed them up...? Not Insanity (the team leader) Not FoFo or Eckz (Team members that also did not touch the wiki).. So.... who's ...
- Sun May 13, 2012 4:03 am
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: PM Vote Trial for Ladle 57
- Replies: 87
- Views: 9144
Re: PM Vote Trial for Ladle 57
So you're specifically reading "Players can not be signed up under multiple teams." Alright so you want to read it like that.. So who's they? All three of them signed and edited the wiki? Aren't you after the one who "signed" them up? Or are you accusing all of them? I don't see insanity, fofo or ec...
- Sun May 13, 2012 3:45 am
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: PM Vote Trial for Ladle 57
- Replies: 87
- Views: 9144
Re: PM Vote Trial for Ladle 57
You'll hate me for this, but I want you punished for being stupid. 
You just confirmed they didn't break rule #2... So why is the vote being cast as them breaking that rule.. You're saying they broke a none existent rule? Why don't you just say that in your vote..
See where it gets sloppy?

You just confirmed they didn't break rule #2... So why is the vote being cast as them breaking that rule.. You're saying they broke a none existent rule? Why don't you just say that in your vote..
See where it gets sloppy?
- Sun May 13, 2012 3:37 am
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: Ladle 57
- Replies: 220
- Views: 24400
Re: Ladle 57
how's that for your own taste of medicine dlh, lack? you couldn't care less, but here you are caring about it enough to take a hit at "certain clans" or "people"?... like me? only because i didn't have anything else more to add to the same discussion, but only 4 years on? because as far as i can rem...
- Sun May 13, 2012 3:29 am
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: PM Vote Trial for Ladle 57
- Replies: 87
- Views: 9144
Re: PM Vote Trial for Ladle 57
First off, if you followed the rules on the wiki, why is insa, fofo and eckz involved in this vote? Team Leaders must list their Global ID on the Challenge board. Players can not be signed up under multiple teams. You may only play for one team each Ladle. They did not violate rule #2... Can you be ...
- Tue Sep 27, 2011 9:02 pm
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: Flex's Fort Cup 2011 - 18th September 2011
- Replies: 15
- Views: 2627
Re: Flex's Fort Cup 2011 - 18th September 2011
Yea sorry it never happened. I PM'ed all the team captains, but none responded or complied. Maybe I wasn't clear enough, but I allowed each clan/team to have a total of 12 players and maximum 2 captains, enough to add pretty much everybody in your team/clan in order to compensate for no-shows, but o...
- Tue Sep 27, 2011 8:50 pm
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: Fort Cup - Signup
- Replies: 172
- Views: 19553
- Sun Sep 11, 2011 2:34 am
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: Where is the Ladle (and Fortress) heading in the future?
- Replies: 180
- Views: 16739
Re: Where is the Ladle (and Fortress) heading in the future?
No it wouldn't be the opposite, because what you're saying is different to what I even said. So no you're not quite agreeing with me. mYm did better against SP than CT CT didn't use a sweep-box and did better against mYm than SP did. Maybe I could have been more clear, but I was referring to mYm pla...
- Fri Sep 09, 2011 10:29 am
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: Where is the Ladle (and Fortress) heading in the future?
- Replies: 180
- Views: 16739
Re: Where is the Ladle (and Fortress) heading in the future?
1vs2 unconquerable would be a useful suggestion if everybody was holing and zones were helpless, but they're not, because last ladle was won with the use of sweepboxing, which prevents holing and that's exactly why it was thought of. This idea is about 3-4 ladles late and it didn't require the game ...
- Fri Sep 09, 2011 9:25 am
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: Flex's Fort Cup 2011 - 18th September 2011
- Replies: 15
- Views: 2627
Re: Flex's Fort Cup 2011 - 18th September 2011
I've completed a near final configuration file for the tournament. It will only contain the map settings and I will provide the authorities and access levels/chat settings, etc, in the other one soon. http://khemist.net/resource/flex/fortress/ffcup/ffcupv2.cfg If you think something should or should...
- Tue Aug 16, 2011 6:27 pm
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: Wager Tournaments (Split)
- Replies: 22
- Views: 2850
Re: Wager Tournaments (Split)
Yes, I emailed and I got pretty much the same response. I did think about moneybrokers or other services, but wasn't sure whether it was as popular as paypal. Anyway, if the entry fee was a worth while amount then it would be something to resolve, at least not for now. The main objective here is to ...
- Sun Aug 14, 2011 9:43 pm
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: Wager Tournaments (Split)
- Replies: 22
- Views: 2850
Re: Flex's Fortress Cup
That would include going through PayPal (which, of course, isn't a bank). Specifically, from PayPal's site : PayPal prohibits the following activities, even where the specific activity is lawful and/or is not legally defined as gambling, unless the transactions are associated with an approved merch...