Armagetron Forums

Umm... Then how are you playing the game? The thing where you're looking at servers to play on is the server browser....

bzr 2.1.1 stable, used command bzr branch lp:~armagetronad-dev/armagetronad/trunk-cmake.
I think the problem is this bug.

I think there's a problem with the trunk-cmake branch, as it isn't wanting to branch. Here's the error bzr is throwing about it. ErrorFromSmartServer: Error received from smart server: ('error', "Absent factor y for ('8692@7d95bf1e-0414-0410-9756-b78462a59f44:armagetronad%2Ftrunk%2Farmaget rona...

Bump.

The bug wasn't in the RESPAWN_HACK portion, and the RESPAWN_HACK wasn't defined in the first place (commented out). :? It seems to be in the call to this, if it helps. void sg_RespawnPlayer(eGrid * grid, gArena * arena, tCoord & near, ePlayerNetID * p) { eGameObject *e=p->Object(); if ( ( !e || ...

Hi, I've been trying to compile a trunk client for windows for probably the last hour, and I've fixed most of the issues I've come across (usleep undefined, boost any.hpp not included, etc) but I have no idea what to do with this one. Please help me? Thanks in advance. C:\Armagetronad\armagetronad\s...

Your config files that are in use have to have both the authentication and sty settings in them. Sty doesn't work unless you're using it.

@Kyle - That's a good point. I threw a newer r702 build up next to your link on the wiki.

Maybe upload it to beta or something so it's somewhat easier for people to find.

@Tanner
If you want the sty+ct dedicated I built at the end of january, it's available here.

@Different55 - If you wanted a prebuilt pigsty branch, why didn't you ask for one instead of asking how to compile one?
http://remissong.org/ArmaBuilds/armaget ... .win32.exe

Branch the 0.2.8 branch, the 0.2.8 winlibs, and the 0.2.8 codeblocks-build-work or whatever its called, then put them all in the same folder. Name the 0.2.8 branch "armagetronad", the winlibs "winlibs". Then go into the codeblocks-build-work folder and open the Armagetron.workspa...

If I remember right, you can just build deb files really easily with checkinstall.
./configure and make, then "sudo checkinstall -D make install".
Perhaps this would be the way to replace the old ubuntu build method stuff?

So it would be md5( clear_password ) with no prefix and suffix? Or would it be md5 ( username . clear_password . username )?

The problem is that we don't understand the md5 hashing logic. How should the hash go? md5(username . password)? Something more complex?

Sweet!
These scripts are really well-done/organized... Interesting to look at. Thanks dlh