Search found 11187 matches
- Mon Jun 03, 2024 9:23 pm
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: Ladle 159 - June 2nd
- Replies: 2
- Views: 227
Re: Ladle 159 - June 2nd
Well, on the topic of playback problems, there is this, the HUD may vanish partially.
- Mon Jun 03, 2024 9:12 pm
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: Ladle 159 - June 2nd
- Replies: 2
- Views: 227
Re: Ladle 159 - June 2nd
Recordings for 0.2.9.2.X: round1_desony_red_vs_bm.aarec 18812kb 1795s round1_nanunj_rac_vs_para.aarec 21592kb 2002s Erm. These two were accidentally recorded with vsync off, so they are quite a bit bigger than they should be and don't fast forward that well. I hope nobody has unusual problems with b...
- Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:52 pm
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: Ladle 158
- Replies: 0
- Views: 659
- Sat Apr 13, 2024 3:27 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: NixOS: The last word in Armagetron hosting
- Replies: 16
- Views: 17448
Re: NixOS: The last word in Armagetron hosting
Heh, I'm looking forward to the day where I understand all of that
- Wed Mar 27, 2024 3:38 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: NixOS: The last word in Armagetron hosting
- Replies: 16
- Views: 17448
Re: NixOS: The last word in Armagetron hosting
Yeah, for someone who loves total and direct control over their system, NixOS is a bad choice. It's the law of leaky abstractions that can strike. You're writing some configuration, and some not entirely clear process creates a different configuration, which some other program then uses. Worst case,...
- Thu Mar 21, 2024 10:37 pm
- Forum: Beta Testing
- Topic: 0.2.9.2 Release Process: Released
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4147
Re: 0.2.9.2 Release Process: Released
No, SDL_compat is supposed to be a straight replacement for SDL1.2. Mind that you still need the 1.2 versions of SDL_mixer and SDL_image. I use something like "nix-shell -p git gcc gnumake pkg-config autoconf automake which gnum4 python3 libxml2 libpng SDL2 SDL_compat SDL_image SDL_mixer" ...
- Wed Mar 20, 2024 8:38 pm
- Forum: Beta Testing
- Topic: 0.2.9.2.3 released
- Replies: 0
- Views: 892
0.2.9.2.3 released
Get it from the download site , Steam or itch.io . For Linux users, there also is Flatpak , Zero Install or the Ubuntu PPA . Apart from the macOS builds now declared stable, there are mostly bugfixes in there. And if you are wondering why there are already newer betas and release candidates, those c...
- Wed Mar 13, 2024 6:57 pm
- Forum: Beta Testing
- Topic: 0.2.9.2 Release Process: Released
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4147
Re: 0.2.9.2 Release Process: Final Staging
The hopefully final build is available: 0.2.9.2.1 . Why .1 already? .0 died a quick death to a sad trombone sound . The new builds are also available on the staging ppa . It was also supposed to appear on the zero install feed, but I borked that with a recent refactoring. Edit: No, it did not. Well,...
- Wed Mar 06, 2024 10:42 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: NixOS: The last word in Armagetron hosting
- Replies: 16
- Views: 17448
Re: NixOS: The last word in Armagetron hosting
This NixOS of yours, very clever. First post from NixOS. What gave me the final push is this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwfKlX3rA6E Yeah, this looks very tantalizing, especially for developers. Most of the benefits of Docker, Flatpak, ZeroInstall etc. without most of the drawbacks. No c...
- Mon Mar 04, 2024 7:47 pm
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: Ladle 157
- Replies: 1
- Views: 918
- Mon Mar 04, 2024 7:45 pm
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: Ladle 157
- Replies: 1
- Views: 918
Ladle 157
Was on March the third! Recordings for 0.2.9.1.1: round1_delidc_ac_vs_bm.aarec 12040kb 1266s round1_nanu_para_vs_red.aarec 24844kb 2174s round2_delidc_ac_vs_para.aarec 11872kb 1512s round2_nanu_rx_vs_red.aarec 14440kb 1243s round3_delieu_red_vs_ac.aarec 8264kb 1060s round3_nanu_bm_vs_rx.aarec 16168k...
- Sun Feb 25, 2024 11:27 pm
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: TST 32 (February 25th, 2024)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1747
- Sun Feb 25, 2024 11:25 pm
- Forum: Competitions
- Topic: TST 32 (February 25th, 2024)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1747
Re: TST 32 (February 25th, 2024)
Recordings for 0.2.9.1.1:
(most of round 1 is missing because I came in late)
round1_delidc.aarec 5764kb 543s
round1_deliuk.aarec 2316kb 264s
round1_nanunj.aarec 1688kb 249s
round2_delidc.aarec 11596kb 1226s
round2_deliuk.aarec 13312kb 1213s
round2_nanunj.aarec 12756kb 1237s
(most of round 1 is missing because I came in late)
round1_delidc.aarec 5764kb 543s
round1_deliuk.aarec 2316kb 264s
round1_nanunj.aarec 1688kb 249s
round2_delidc.aarec 11596kb 1226s
round2_deliuk.aarec 13312kb 1213s
round2_nanunj.aarec 12756kb 1237s
- Sun Feb 25, 2024 7:59 pm
- Forum: Beta Testing
- Topic: 0.2.9.2 Release Process: Released
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4147
Re: 0.2.9.2 Release Process: Beta
The fix is now on all branches and all current source tarballs and builds.
- Fri Feb 23, 2024 11:39 pm
- Forum: Beta Testing
- Topic: 0.2.9.2 Release Process: Released
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4147
Re: 0.2.9.2 Release Process: Beta
Thanks for the feedback! Umm. Funny thing. Remember way back, when we found out that the clever pattern to avoid null checks before function calls class X { void f() { if(!this) return; // do some actual work } } was undefined behavior, the compiler was allowed to assume 'this' was never null and th...