Search found 875 matches

by owned
Tue Feb 24, 2015 7:01 pm
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Ladle 91
Replies: 53
Views: 4173

Re: Ladle 91

Does anyone know what vein and algid's GIDs are? They are not yet on the ladle banlist.
by owned
Tue Feb 17, 2015 9:04 am
Forum: Competitions
Topic: BANNED Vogue (85-107), algid and vein GID (91-102)
Replies: 49
Views: 4391

Re: Trial Ladle 90, Vogue, algid and vein GID

It's their fault they didn't vote. People had a full week.
by owned
Tue Jan 13, 2015 10:45 pm
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Ladle 89
Replies: 47
Views: 3802

Re: Ladle 89

Congrats RD, and thanks for replaying the last match after those lag bombs.

+1 CT USA
-1 Agility's NY
-1 Theo's FR3
by owned
Fri Jan 09, 2015 3:05 am
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Ladle 89
Replies: 47
Views: 3802

Re: Ladle 89

Is the bracket time or the table time correct on the wiki?
by owned
Mon Nov 03, 2014 3:28 am
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Ladle 87
Replies: 124
Views: 7031

Re: Ladle 87

Congrats R!

+1 Theo's FR3
by owned
Mon Oct 06, 2014 12:07 am
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Ladle 86
Replies: 55
Views: 4894

Re: Ladle 86

Congrats R!

@theo
In this case rounds means number of teams beaten. They beat 4 teams in ladles 29 and 30 and then 3 teams in ladles 31 and 32 for 14 in all.
by owned
Thu Oct 02, 2014 4:33 pm
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Ladle 86
Replies: 55
Views: 4894

Re: Ladle 86

For anyone who forgot, this is the link where mister was punished: http://forums3.armagetronad.net/viewtop ... 60&t=23705
by owned
Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:08 am
Forum: General
Topic: Multi-binding
Replies: 7
Views: 803

Re: Multi-binding

Lol who added the Quaternion binding
by owned
Wed Jul 23, 2014 2:22 am
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Ladle 83 Rule Change Discussion
Replies: 77
Views: 4913

Re: Ladle 83 Rule Change Discussion

Other than the warning system itself, I like the way this was run.
by owned
Sat Jul 19, 2014 7:19 am
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Ladle 83 Rule Change Discussion
Replies: 77
Views: 4913

Re: Ladle 83 Rule Change Discussion

There also needs to be a list of the people who voted so the person conducting the voting can't add votes that came from no one.
by owned
Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:51 pm
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Ladle 83 Rule Change Discussion
Replies: 77
Views: 4913

Re: Ladle 83 Voting Ban Discussion

Well thanks for the link. I admit I was wrong.

Anyways, I think kyle made a good point that there are several things we need to change. From now on this will be a thread about all rule changes like my suggestion, the op rule, and anything else.

I'll tentatively set the vote to start July 20th.
by owned
Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:44 pm
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Ladle 83 Rule Change Discussion
Replies: 77
Views: 4913

Re: Ladle 83 Voting Ban Discussion

the decisions made back at Ladle 36 don't determine what decisions we make now. I disagree with that, because that is what the community decided on back then, yes stuff has changed bla bla bla, but we have not approved anything new yet. Maybe I should have been more clear, but that's what I was try...
by owned
Fri Jul 11, 2014 6:50 am
Forum: Competitions
Topic: /op discussion and Ladle 83 CT USA logs
Replies: 6
Views: 808

Re: Ladle 83 CT USA logs

I agree. This makes sense and I see no good reason against it.
by owned
Fri Jul 11, 2014 6:47 am
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Ladle 83 Rule Change Discussion
Replies: 77
Views: 4913

Re: Ladle 83 Voting Ban Discussion

Can you please give evidence that it was voted on instead of just saying it was? Kyle posted it above. The Warning section was part of the sweeping L-36 rule revisions. You even commented on them yourself, as I linked to above. I'm confused. You're sending me to a link about voting on seeding. Not ...
by owned
Fri Jul 11, 2014 5:18 am
Forum: Competitions
Topic: Ladle 83 Rule Change Discussion
Replies: 77
Views: 4913

Re: Ladle 83 Voting Ban Discussion

Can you please give evidence that it was voted on instead of just saying it was? From the topic that kyle posted, it seems like this list was drafted by you guys and after some discussion between people (like me) it was put in the ladle rules section. Regardless of whether it was voted on or not tho...