Compiling Source into an exe...

Website · Post by **Z-Man** » Wed Dec 03, 2008 10:05 am

He means "Good luck. You'll need it. Tons of it."

Infa(mous) · Post by **Infa(mous)** » Sat Dec 06, 2008 1:43 am

Ah.

Loor · Post by **Loor** » Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:08 am

How about a mac? :p

Infa(mous) · Post by **Infa(mous)** » Sat Dec 06, 2008 4:08 pm

Macs can compile source, i think. Windows can't <-- Windows Sucks.

Post by **epsy** » Sat Dec 06, 2008 4:19 pm

you are comparing a brand of machines to a software
OSX can't compile anything, just as linux or windows

Infa(mous) · Post by **Infa(mous)** » Sun Dec 07, 2008 3:14 am

/me thinks that Epsy is being overanalytical.

Post by **epsy** » Sun Dec 07, 2008 12:39 pm

well, there are pieces of software that can be run on windows which are meant to compile stuff (otherwise you wouldn't have any software at all), so both meanings of your affirmations are wrong, and you're also comparing an OS to a brand of machines, so that didn't make much sense to work with

Infa(mous) · Post by **Infa(mous)** » Mon Dec 22, 2008 2:07 am

K... I've gotten it sort of working. It says I don't have libxml2, even though i do, though...