Ladle 54
Moderator: Light
Re: Ladle 54
two great matches, that was a lot of fun. thanks sp, mym.
Re: Ladle 54
3* great matchesConcord wrote:two great matches, that was a lot of fun. thanks sp, mym.
That was the most fun i've ever had in a ladle. lol it was full with lols and aweomsness.
100-98 for the match decider has to be the most epic thing i've ever been apart of.
-
- Match Winner
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:36 am
Re: Ladle 54
Good shit, thanks SP and mym.
no vote for ct usa because it was fine but it did collapse a couple of times.
+1 for UnKs
no vote for ct usa because it was fine but it did collapse a couple of times.
+1 for UnKs
- kyle
- Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
- Posts: 1876
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 3:33 pm
- Location: Indiana, USA, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy, Universe, Multiverse
- Contact:
Re: Ladle 54
I plan on updating the server and the net actually was bad on the servers end for some strange reason. It did settle out latter on. I still am not positive on why it crashed.PokeMaster wrote:no vote for ct usa because it was fine but it did collapse a couple of times.
- ElmosWorld
- Match Winner
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:38 pm
Re: Ladle 54
gms SP and mYm
+1 for uNk
-1 for CT USA, crashed and had lots of disappearing lines
+1 for uNk
-1 for CT USA, crashed and had lots of disappearing lines
Re: Ladle 54
I've been getting some negative feedback for my DAL server, so I'm going to ditch it. It isn't worth it for these results. Maybe I'll snag a NY one with the same specs.
Re: Ladle 54
Gz mym, gg's.
You have to admit you were lucky not to lose 2-0 though
+1 for z-man's
0 for Team elite, it was stable most of the time, but under heavy load (lots of sumo inside the zone) lines started to disappear.
+1 for wherever the final was..mbx was it?
You have to admit you were lucky not to lose 2-0 though
+1 for z-man's
0 for Team elite, it was stable most of the time, but under heavy load (lots of sumo inside the zone) lines started to disappear.
+1 for wherever the final was..mbx was it?
Re: Ladle 54
Good matches.
I'd have to say that the theme today for mYm was close calls, but it was still surprising how much they frequented. I'm curious why you guys let up on pressuring our center, because, to me, that's what really gave you guys the first match. It seemed like you let off more and more as the rounds continued.
It was the ninth consecutive seed, sixth consecutive ladle final, and third win for Meet Your Maker. Pretty proud, because our team chat was a mess.
See you guys next month.
Ratings:
uNk :: -1, it was choppy for me, invisible walls, etc. Not quite sure how I managed.
CT USA :: 0, I heard that it had crashed a couple times, but personally it was okay.
CT LIV :: +1, this server was pretty good for a European server as an American.
I'd have to say that the theme today for mYm was close calls, but it was still surprising how much they frequented. I'm curious why you guys let up on pressuring our center, because, to me, that's what really gave you guys the first match. It seemed like you let off more and more as the rounds continued.
It was the ninth consecutive seed, sixth consecutive ladle final, and third win for Meet Your Maker. Pretty proud, because our team chat was a mess.
See you guys next month.
Ratings:
uNk :: -1, it was choppy for me, invisible walls, etc. Not quite sure how I managed.
CT USA :: 0, I heard that it had crashed a couple times, but personally it was okay.
CT LIV :: +1, this server was pretty good for a European server as an American.
Re: Ladle 54
Gaa, too many recordings.
Final:
final_ctliv_mym_vs_unk.aarec 37460kb 3648s
Semis:
semi_ctliv_pl_vs_mym.aarec 26028kb 2507s
semi_ctliv_pl_vs_mym_firstbit_broken.aarec 1788kb 541s (Camera stuck, nothing is visible. I'll see if that's a fixable client bug. Sorry for not noticing earlier.)
semi_te_unk_vs_tx.aarec 26396kb 2698s
Quarters:
quarter_ctliv_te_vs_plx.aarec 20088kb 2891s
quarter_ctmbx_ctb_vs_tx.aarec 21184kb 2105s
Final:
final_ctliv_mym_vs_unk.aarec 37460kb 3648s
Semis:
semi_ctliv_pl_vs_mym.aarec 26028kb 2507s
semi_ctliv_pl_vs_mym_firstbit_broken.aarec 1788kb 541s (Camera stuck, nothing is visible. I'll see if that's a fixable client bug. Sorry for not noticing earlier.)
semi_te_unk_vs_tx.aarec 26396kb 2698s
Quarters:
quarter_ctliv_te_vs_plx.aarec 20088kb 2891s
quarter_ctmbx_ctb_vs_tx.aarec 21184kb 2105s
- compguygene
- Adjust Outside Corner Grinder
- Posts: 2346
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:09 pm
- Location: Cleveland, Ohio
- Contact:
Re: Ladle 54
I will look into it. I may need to redo the hosting server. Thanks for the feedback.Cronix wrote:yes gz tx.
@comp:
I really appreciate that you offer servers for us to play on, but somehow ID VA 1 was not stable once again.
Maybe you have a solution for that
Armagetron: It's a video game that people should just play and enjoy
https://bit.ly/2KBGYjvCheck out the simple site about TheServerPharm
https://bit.ly/2KBGYjvCheck out the simple site about TheServerPharm
Re: Ladle 54
Definitely one of the most exciting Ladles. Many close matches and everyone was on their game. Too bad it took six hours to finish, haha.
Global stats attached.
Global stats attached.
- Attachments
-
- ladle_stats_54.xls
- (19.5 KiB) Downloaded 81 times
- ElmosWorld
- Match Winner
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:38 pm
Re: Ladle 54
sinewav wrote:wrong way elmo
no use in 5 people attacking a sweepbox
Re: Ladle 54
Hole it!ElmosWorld wrote:no use in 5 people attacking a sweepboxsinewav wrote:wrong way elmo