Ladle 47

A place for threads related to tournaments and the like, and things related too.

Moderator: Light

Post Reply
PokeMaster
Match Winner
Posts: 638
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:36 am

Re: Ladle 47

Post by PokeMaster »

I've never been a fan of limit_rounds really. I'm for taking it away.
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
User avatar
teen
Round Winner
Posts: 390
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 2:27 am

Re: Ladle 47

Post by teen »

Titanoboa wrote:It sucks when you lose.

Why do we have elimination tourneys? Wouldn't it all be better if nobody got eliminated and everyone got to play until the finals? No losers, all winners.


(I wouldn't mind a limit_time instead of limit_rounds and limit_score, it works great in pickup. However, the current system is awesome (correct me if i'm wrong. just speak up if ladle isn't your favorite fort event) and it allows for great matches. Really great matches. Why would we change that?)

Oh and I too had the opportunity to taste the bitterness of limit_rounds 10 this ladle. Score was like 74-86 against CTb in the first match, and they suicided & thus won the match. That sucked for us, but it was prolly fun for them ;) And it was in no way an unfair victory.


But suicides are suicides :/ what if it is
By the way here's a suggestion. How about a new setting that can give the enemy team x points if you suicide (no specific player, just the enemy team). I've always thought that it's unfair that you can die without giving the enemies any points, and it's becoming more and more common with tactical suicides.
Example: Team blue was awarded 2 points because Titanoboa committed suicide. I'm sure one of you can come up with a better wording though, haha.
(And before anyone says it.. No, I don't think score_suicide -2 would have the same effect at all.)

but what if it is 98-88 and it is 3v1 and the defender suicides to save the zone and from him being holed.
Image
User avatar
INW
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1950
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:10 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA

Re: Ladle 47

Post by INW »

This topic should be split into a ladle 48 discussion topic.

Maybe a vote will happen soon.
Cody
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 959
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 6:43 am

Re: Ladle 47

Post by Cody »

sinewav wrote:If I were to change anything, I'd forget about limit_time and remove limit_rounds, making it purely based on score. It's pretty rare for a Ladle match to end on rounds, and there are plenty of matches that go on much too long and never reach 10 rounds, so, raising the round limit won't positively mean longer Ladles. In fact, raising the number of rounds creates more opportunities for exciting comebacks, which we can all agree is a good thing. And of course, making limit_score the only way to victory immediately eliminates team suicides.
Limit_Score = pure awesomeness!
dariv
Round Winner
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:24 pm

Re: Ladle 47

Post by dariv »

sinewav wrote:If I were to change anything, I'd forget about limit_time and remove limit_rounds, making it purely based on score. It's pretty rare for a Ladle match to end on rounds, and there are plenty of matches that go on much too long and never reach 10 rounds, so, raising the round limit won't positively mean longer Ladles. In fact, raising the number of rounds creates more opportunities for exciting comebacks, which we can all agree is a good thing. And of course, making limit_score the only way to victory immediately eliminates team suicides.
+1 nice idea. I thought we had a comeback going on and it was cut short. It would only have taken 1 more round.
pLxDari - Challenge us!
User avatar
INW
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1950
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:10 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA

Re: Ladle 47

Post by INW »

sinewav wrote:If I were to change anything, I'd forget about limit_time and remove limit_rounds, making it purely based on score. It's pretty rare for a Ladle match to end on rounds, and there are plenty of matches that go on much too long and never reach 10 rounds, so, raising the round limit won't positively mean longer Ladles. In fact, raising the number of rounds creates more opportunities for exciting comebacks, which we can all agree is a good thing. And of course, making limit_score the only way to victory immediately eliminates team suicides.
I would vote for this idea. I don't really have a problem with the current ladle system but I wouldn't mind this.
User avatar
2020
Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1322
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:21 pm
Location: the present, finally

Re: Ladle 47

Post by 2020 »

yup
round limit is a shadow from original fortress settings
no need for it in the ladle

i still think it might be a useful patch
if a whole 3 or 5 match game was programmed
which would have a time limit
but the number of teams don't demand this move yet...
in a bigger tournament
timing will become a real issue

and gratz to unk :)
hold the line
User avatar
ElmosWorld
Match Winner
Posts: 610
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:38 pm

Re: Ladle 47

Post by ElmosWorld »

teen wrote:
Titanoboa wrote:It sucks when you lose.

Why do we have elimination tourneys? Wouldn't it all be better if nobody got eliminated and everyone got to play until the finals? No losers, all winners.


(I wouldn't mind a limit_time instead of limit_rounds and limit_score, it works great in pickup. However, the current system is awesome (correct me if i'm wrong. just speak up if ladle isn't your favorite fort event) and it allows for great matches. Really great matches. Why would we change that?)

Oh and I too had the opportunity to taste the bitterness of limit_rounds 10 this ladle. Score was like 74-86 against CTb in the first match, and they suicided & thus won the match. That sucked for us, but it was prolly fun for them ;) And it was in no way an unfair victory.


But suicides are suicides :/ what if it is
By the way here's a suggestion. How about a new setting that can give the enemy team x points if you suicide (no specific player, just the enemy team). I've always thought that it's unfair that you can die without giving the enemies any points, and it's becoming more and more common with tactical suicides.
Example: Team blue was awarded 2 points because Titanoboa committed suicide. I'm sure one of you can come up with a better wording though, haha.
(And before anyone says it.. No, I don't think score_suicide -2 would have the same effect at all.)

but what if it is 98-88 and it is 3v1 and the defender suicides to save the zone and from him being holed.
If the gold defender suicides in that case blue gets 6 points anyway and wins the match.
Image
User avatar
INW
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1950
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:10 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA

Re: Ladle 47

Post by INW »

ElmosWorld wrote:
teen wrote:
Titanoboa wrote:It sucks when you lose.

Why do we have elimination tourneys? Wouldn't it all be better if nobody got eliminated and everyone got to play until the finals? No losers, all winners.


(I wouldn't mind a limit_time instead of limit_rounds and limit_score, it works great in pickup. However, the current system is awesome (correct me if i'm wrong. just speak up if ladle isn't your favorite fort event) and it allows for great matches. Really great matches. Why would we change that?)

Oh and I too had the opportunity to taste the bitterness of limit_rounds 10 this ladle. Score was like 74-86 against CTb in the first match, and they suicided & thus won the match. That sucked for us, but it was prolly fun for them ;) And it was in no way an unfair victory.


But suicides are suicides :/ what if it is
By the way here's a suggestion. How about a new setting that can give the enemy team x points if you suicide (no specific player, just the enemy team). I've always thought that it's unfair that you can die without giving the enemies any points, and it's becoming more and more common with tactical suicides.
Example: Team blue was awarded 2 points because Titanoboa committed suicide. I'm sure one of you can come up with a better wording though, haha.
(And before anyone says it.. No, I don't think score_suicide -2 would have the same effect at all.)

but what if it is 98-88 and it is 3v1 and the defender suicides to save the zone and from him being holed.
If the gold defender suicides in that case blue gets 6 points anyway and wins the match.
Am I reading this correctly? 88 + 6 = 94 < 98?
User avatar
DDMJ
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1882
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 12:15 am
Location: LA, CA, USA, NA
Contact:

Re: Ladle 47

Post by DDMJ »

No INW you aren't because blue has 98...98 + 6 = 104 > 88

He meant 1v3 where the team that has the 1 is up 98-88. But then it would be tied 98 - 98, so perhaps he really meant 98 - 90?
User avatar
INW
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1950
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:10 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA

Re: Ladle 47

Post by INW »

DDMJ wrote:No INW you aren't because blue has 98...98 + 6 = 104 > 88

He meant 1v3 where the team that has the 1 is up 98-88. But then it would be tied 98 - 98, so perhaps he really meant 98 - 90?
oic, I thought blue had the 1.

Ya, if yellow suicides, blue would get the round win points and win anyway.

I'm a derp.
User avatar
ElmosWorld
Match Winner
Posts: 610
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:38 pm

Re: Ladle 47

Post by ElmosWorld »

DDMJ wrote:No INW you aren't because blue has 98...98 + 6 = 104 > 88

He meant 1v3 where the team that has the 1 is up 98-88. But then it would be tied 98 - 98, so perhaps he really meant 98 - 90?
Wouldn't you assume that gold wouldn't get the zone and would still lose 98-94(or 96 depending on whether the death gave points or not)?
Image
User avatar
dreadlord
Match Winner
Posts: 585
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:26 am
Location: Germany

Re: Ladle 47

Post by dreadlord »

I think he wanted to point out that, without getting points for the suicide of an enemy, the defender has the opportunity to end the round with the score 98-98. In any other case the team of the defender would lose the match, so all in all this supports the idea of points for the enemy team if a player suicides.
User avatar
apparition
Match Winner
Posts: 630
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:59 am
Location: The Mitten, USA

Re: Ladle 47

Post by apparition »

Congratulationssssssss team.uNk.team!!!! Well done mates! I totally called it in my head :)
User avatar
teen
Round Winner
Posts: 390
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 2:27 am

Re: Ladle 47

Post by teen »

LOL my math skills need some improvement :/
Image
Post Reply