Ladle 47

A place for threads related to tournaments and the like, and things related too.

Moderator: Light

Post Reply
User avatar
Aiphaton
Average Program
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:03 pm

Re: Ladle 47

Post by Aiphaton »

gz uNk nice matches

and thx everyone for playing was a nice ladle
- Don’t regret anything you do because in the end, it makes you who you are -
User avatar
theroze
Match Winner
Posts: 596
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 7:30 am
Location: 47 72 69 64

Re: Ladle 47

Post by theroze »

YAY! The time no one predicts uNk to win the ladle, they win! Gz dudes :D
apparition wrote:You being able to kill so many players that quickly and efficiently is evidence that the community skill level must be dropping... Sad :/
Reigning champion of: Sir-spam-a-lot 2011
User avatar
Jip
Round Winner
Posts: 397
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:32 pm

Re: Ladle 47

Post by Jip »

Good matches everyone, was a fun ladle!

One suggestion for a configuration change: can we add

Code: Select all

DEFAULT_SHOUT_SPECTATORS 0
to the .cfg file?
User avatar
dreadlord
Match Winner
Posts: 585
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:26 am
Location: Germany

Re: Ladle 47

Post by dreadlord »

Cool, congratulations team.unk, as many guys said before: You deserve it. ;)

Thanks for the matches Speedhax, I learned that I should not have played tron after one week without tron. :)
milan
Average Program
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 5:47 pm
Location: Belgrade, Serbia

Re: Ladle 47

Post by milan »

Gratz uNk, we will follow in your footsteps soon :D
User avatar
fingerbib
Core Dumper
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:02 am

Re: Ladle 47

Post by fingerbib »

Thanks everyone <3

I hope so Milan :star:
he said.
User avatar
sinewav
Graphic Artist
Posts: 6472
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:37 am
Contact:

Re: Ladle 47

Post by sinewav »

Jip wrote:Good matches everyone, was a fun ladle!

One suggestion for a configuration change: can we add

Code: Select all

DEFAULT_SHOUT_SPECTATORS 0
to the .cfg file?
This will only affect Ladle servers with that branch, and I think all of them have that enabled already. Should that branch be a requirement? This is a discussion we can have. Before we do any additions, we should talk about what else from that branch we need too.
User avatar
Jip
Round Winner
Posts: 397
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:32 pm

Re: Ladle 47

Post by Jip »

sinewav wrote:
Jip wrote:Good matches everyone, was a fun ladle!

One suggestion for a configuration change: can we add

Code: Select all

DEFAULT_SHOUT_SPECTATORS 0
to the .cfg file?
This will only affect Ladle servers with that branch, and I think all of them have that enabled already. Should that branch be a requirement? This is a discussion we can have. Before we do any additions, we should talk about what else from that branch we need too.
It was merged to mainline already a while ago. So every server wich got updated since then should have that. (I remember most servers got updated when someone took down > 100 servers at may 13)
User avatar
sinewav
Graphic Artist
Posts: 6472
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:37 am
Contact:

Re: Ladle 47

Post by sinewav »

Ok, what else to we need to add from that branch? Anything? Let's think about this before we ask kyle to update the configuration file (though he should be along any second with a response to this).
User avatar
Jip
Round Winner
Posts: 397
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:32 pm

Re: Ladle 47

Post by Jip »

It should be:

Code: Select all

ACCESS_LEVEL_SHOUT 20
DEFAULT_SHOUT_SPECTATOR 0
Even if someone didnt update their server, it doesn't do any harm.
User avatar
pike
Round Winner
Posts: 397
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:53 pm
Location: where polar bears walk the streets

Re: Ladle 47

Post by pike »

Congratulations Unks! A surprising win (after your _slightly_ better team got beaten by SP), but that's what Fort needed. Just remember that next Ladle is CT's :D
User avatar
sinewav
Graphic Artist
Posts: 6472
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:37 am
Contact:

Re: Ladle 47

Post by sinewav »

By the way, I think it's really cool how the larger teams who enter two squads in Ladle have balanced them out, whether intentionally or not. It used to be one squad had all the ringers and the other had the scrubs, but this doesn't seem to be the case anymore. I get the feeling CTa vs CTb would be a toss-up, as well as SP1 vs SP2.
dariv
Round Winner
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:24 pm

Re: Ladle 47

Post by dariv »

good matches all

what is the reason for a 10 round limit?
pLxDari - Challenge us!
syllabear
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 1030
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 1:37 pm
Location: UK/HK

Re: Ladle 47

Post by syllabear »

thats the way fort has always been dariv.
The Halley's comet of Armagetron.
ps I'm not tokoyami
User avatar
þsy
Match Winner
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 8:52 pm

Re: Ladle 47

Post by þsy »

What a crazy ladle!

First of all, a massive GZ to unk.. You guys have been fighting for a ladle win for so long, and there is no team who have worked harder for it. Very well deserved :)

Secondly, well done to Speedhax. I am stunned, I think they had the hardest fixtures in any ladle ever! They were the top favourites to go out first, so it was an unbelievable run, good job guys.

Finaly, did anyone see my hole against unk? Mkay was grinding me and we drove into fingerbib's defence, and we just kept going! No hole was made, we literally drove through the wall into the defence without anyone dying. We must of hit the wall at the exact same time or something, how weird :D

Bring on the next ladle motherladies
Post Reply